At Laidlaw & Simon P.C., we are committed to providing high-level service with the breadth of a full-service firm. For over 50 years, we have served clients throughout Westchester County, New York City, and abroad, offering solutions to our clients' needs in litigation and dispute resolution, trusts and estates, elder law, corporate, employment, real estate, and land use and zoning. Our attorneys and staff have merged with Falcon Rappaport & Berkman LLP, expanding our services to include taxation, asset protection, creditors' rights and bankruptcy, digital assets, election law & campaign finance, healthcare, intellectual property, and more.
Our History
Formerly known as Hollis Laidlaw & Simon P.C., our law firm has a rich history of providing exceptional legal guidance to our clients. We have built a reputation on our commitment to excellence, and our merger with Falcon Rappaport & Berkman LLP has expanded our capabilities to serve our clients even better.
Our Services
We offer a wide range of legal services to meet the diverse needs of our clients. Our practice areas include:
- Litigation and Dispute Resolution
- Trusts and Estates
- Elder Law
- Corporate
- Employment
- Real Estate
- Land Use and Zoning
- Taxation
- Asset Protection
- Creditors' Rights and Bankruptcy
- Digital Assets
- Election Law & Campaign Finance
- Healthcare
- Intellectual Property
Our Commitment
At Laidlaw & Simon P.C., we are dedicated to providing exceptional legal guidance to our clients. We strive to build long-term relationships with our clients, and our team of experienced attorneys is committed to delivering high-quality service with a personal touch.
Professionalism and Compassion
Many of the reviewers praised Moira S. Laidlaw and her team for their professionalism, compassion, and kindness. They were described as knowledgeable, courteous, and genuinely caring, making the process of estate planning a pleasant and educational experience.
Inconsistent Customer Service
However, one reviewer had a negative experience with Moria S. Laidlaw. They felt that she was uncompassionate, rude, and constantly spoke over them, refusing to provide a consultation and instead insisting on an in-office consultation with a hefty price tag.
